The main recommendations in this work address the following:

The first relates to the harmonization of the newly introduced possibility of multiple seizures in the process of forced execution of movable and immovable property in the hands of the debtor, with a multitude of existing other institutions in the law of forced execution, such as announcement, substitution, etc., which seem to have completely lost their purpose.

The second recommendation deals with the institution of electronic auctions and specifically with the question of whether the new regulations harmonize with essential and necessary principles that must govern this forced sale of the debtor's property in order to satisfy the creditors.

Finally, the third recommendation addresses the issue created in practice by the, as it has been proven, legislatively misguided abolition of the stay of execution, which consequently leaves the debtor completely unprotected in the advancing forced execution.

Case law has here intentionally chosen economic solutions that are fundamentally dogmatically misguided, such as the analogous application of the provisions of articles 731 et seq. of the Code, which solutions, although dictated by the Supreme Court itself, do not seem to be adopted even uniformly in the daily practice of the courts of interim measures, resulting in serious legal insecurity as well as the multiplication of lawsuits, thereby further burdening the judiciary.

The volume also includes interesting interventions, rebuttals, and conclusions.